Samsung WEP700

The first thing to notice when the Samsung WEP700 (65 euro), is its smart design in glossy plastic. Casual fit the headset to the jogging pants as well as tails. Here the test report with the Sony Ericsson W890i.

  1. Samsung WEP700
  2. Data sheet
  3. Rating

Whether this a Nokia 6300 or a Sony Ericsson W890i represents the remote site that is significant only for the standby times: with the Nokia the Samsung achieved a very good value (274 hours), which is approximately 100 hours higher than with the W890i. However, the operating time is almost independent from the mobile phone.

In the category handling is pioneering the Samsung and other shows where the hammer hangs. The tactile quality of the headset is extremely comfortable, the housing is well processed, the optional bracket is unprecedented elastic and can be effortlessly each ear form put on. Therefore, the headset sits securely and remains in the ear, even at sweeping head motion to the car radio.

Somewhat Spartan fails the Accessories: for 65 euro the buyer Gets the headset plus charging cable – basta. The Samsung WEP700 had then something to fight with the acoustic measurement. The values to plummet here a little.

The voice quality is still acceptable, and a very decent headset is the WEP700

Technical data and test results

FACILITIES
Volume control / mute Circuit /
Charger 220V / 12V (car) /
USB charging cable
Battery / battery replaceable Li-ion /.
Profile: Headset / Handsfree /
MEASURED VALUES
ENDURANCE
Standby time / operating time 7T 12:34:00 / 7:28:00
ACOUSTICS (SEND AND RECEIVE)
Volume value send / Receiving directionB 22.1 / 16.7
Distortion of transmit and receive direction (dB) -22.0 / – 25.9
Weight headset / charger (g) 11.4 / 57
Betriebszeit30 25

Rating

TEST RESULTS
ENDURANCE up to 150 good (120)
Standby time / Betriebszeit120 / 30 95 / 25
FACILITIES 50 satisfactory (34)
HANDLING up to 150 very good (138)
Processing / operation 20 / 40 19 / 37
Comfort / weight 55 / 35 51 / 31
Acoustics up to 150 sufficient (95)
tested in issue: NC1 / 09

 

Leave a Reply